You may be trying to access this site from a secured browser on the server. Please enable scripts and reload this page.
Turn on more accessible mode
Turn off more accessible mode
Skip Ribbon Commands
Skip to main content
Turn off Animations
Turn on Animations
Skip Main Navigation
Skip All Navigation
Albany Law Journal of Science and Technology
Are E-Discovery Costs Recoverable By A Prevailing Party?
20.0000000000000 ALB. L.J. SCI. & TECH. 537 (2010)
Steven C. Bennett
The costs of electronic discovery can be crushing. Such costs, moreover, can easily be imposed (with a few strokes of the word-processing key-board, a standard demand for documents and electronically stored information may issue). Some critics fear that e-discovery may be used as a weapon, to extract unwarranted settlements, merely as a means to avoid the burdens of e-discovery. Many courts and commentators suggest cooperation and early planning and judicial intervention as methods of reigning in such costs. But, so long as incentives exist to over-state e-discovery demands, such methods may be inherently limited.