You may be trying to access this site from a secured browser on the server. Please enable scripts and reload this page.
Turn on more accessible mode
Turn off more accessible mode
Skip Ribbon Commands
Skip to main content
Turn off Animations
Turn on Animations
Skip Main Navigation
Skip All Navigation
Albany Law Journal of Science and Technology
The Ethics of “Mining for Metadata”
20.0000000000000 ALB. L.J. SCI. & TECH. 231 (2010)
Andrew J. Cavo
Imagine the following extreme scenario: you represent the defendant in a contract dispute and a junior associate at the plaintiff’s firm sends you a Microsoft Word document that purports to represent the plaintiff’s final, pay-it-or-we-go-to-trial settlement demand of $10-million. But you suspect the plaintiff would actually settle for far less. So, in a frenzy of zealous representation, you "mine for metadata"; that is, you deliberately search that document’s hidden or embedded information. A few mouse clicks reveal a wealth of information: when the document was created, who worked on it, for how long . . . a few more clicks and . . . what’s this?! You are still looking at the same document, but it now includes comments in the margins, made during the document’s editing process! One such comment from the head partner reads, "We’ll tell them $10 million for now, but that’s just to feel them out. Our actual bottom line is $750,000." Armed with that information, you counteroffer for $500,000 and eventually settle the case for exactly $750,000. The few minutes it took you to "mine for metadata" (combined with your opposing counsel’s inadvertent metadata disclosure) saved your client millions!