You may be trying to access this site from a secured browser on the server. Please enable scripts and reload this page.
Turn on more accessible mode
Turn off more accessible mode
Skip Ribbon Commands
Skip to main content
Turn off Animations
Turn on Animations
Skip Main Navigation
Skip All Navigation
Albany Law Journal of Science and Technology
Will Video Kill the Trial Courts’ Star? How “Hot” Records Will Change the Appellate Process
19.0000000000000 ALB. L.J. SCI. & TECH. 449 (2009)
Leah A. Walker
Recent innovations in technology have allowed appellate courts unprecedented access to information from the lower courts that previously was not available. While this access can allow appellate judges to connect to the record on a deeper, more thorough level, it also leaves them open to charges that they are overstepping their traditional deference to the lower courts’ factfinder function. What happens to such deference when the appellate courts have access to a “multimedia” record that mimics the first-hand experience of the trial judge? Should traditional appellate deference to cold records be ignored in an age of hot records? Or should such evidence be more appropriately introduced before a jury acting as the factfinder?